Answer
The press release you quoted tells us that CBL Properties’ Board has raised the quarterly cash dividend to $0.45 per share (12.5 % higher than the prior quarter) and that the annualized dividend will be $1.80 per share. However, the release does not provide any of the financial metrics that are needed to judge whether this higher payout can be sustained—specifically, it does not disclose:
- the amount of cash generated by operations (operating cash flow or free cash flow) for the most recent quarter or fiscal year,
- the company’s current dividend payout ratio (dividend per share divided by earnings per share or free cash flow per share), or
- any commentary on balance‑sheet strength, debt maturities, or capital‑expenditure plans that might affect cash availability.
Because of that, any assessment of sustainability must be based on information outside the news release (e.g., the latest 10‑Q/10‑K filings, earnings call transcripts, or analyst reports). Below is a framework you can use, together with the typical data points you’ll need to locate, to reach a reasoned conclusion about the durability of CBL’s dividend increase.
1. What to Look At First – Cash‑Flow Coverage
Metric | Why It Matters | Typical “healthy” threshold |
---|---|---|
Operating cash flow (OCF) per share | Shows the cash the business actually generates before financing or investing activities. A dividend that exceeds OCF per share is unsustainable. | OCF per share ≥ 1.5 × quarterly dividend (i.e., ≥ $0.68 per share for a $0.45 dividend). |
Free cash flow (FCF) per share | OCF minus capital‑expenditure (CAPEX) and working‑capital needs. This is the cash truly available for shareholders. | FCF per share ≥ 1.2 × quarterly dividend. |
Cash‑and‑cash equivalents | A sizable cash buffer can smooth short‑term shortfalls. | ≥ 3–6 months of dividend payments in cash. |
How to obtain:
- Look at CBL’s most recent Form 10‑Q (quarterly) or 10‑K (annual) filing.
- The “Cash Flow Statement” will list net cash provided by operating activities and cash used for investing activities (CAPEX).
- Divide the quarterly OCF/FCF by the number of shares outstanding (found in the “Shareholders’ Equity” section) to get a per‑share figure.
2. Payout Ratio – The Direct Link Between Earnings/FCF and Dividends
Ratio | Definition | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Dividend‑payout ratio (earnings) | Dividend per share ÷ earnings per share (EPS). | A ratio > 100 % means dividends exceed reported earnings—possible only if the firm is using cash reserves or borrowing. |
Dividend‑payout ratio (free cash flow) | Dividend per share ÷ free cash flow per share. | A ratio > 70 % suggests limited cash left for other needs (e.g., debt service, growth). |
Typical sustainable ranges for REITs (CBL is a REIT):
- EPS‑based payout: 70 %–90 % (some REITs run higher because REITs are required to distribute most taxable income).
- FCF‑based payout: 50 %–70 % is considered comfortable; > 80 % can be a warning sign.
How to obtain:
- EPS is reported on the income statement (or in the “Management’s Discussion & Analysis” section).
- FCF per share is derived as described above.
3. Debt Service & Leverage
Even if cash flow covers the dividend, a high debt load can limit the ability to keep paying. Key figures:
Metric | What to watch |
---|---|
Debt‑to‑EBITDA | Measures leverage; REITs often target ≤ 4.0×. |
Interest‑coverage ratio (EBIT/interest expense) | Should be comfortably above 1.5×; low coverage may force dividend cuts. |
Debt maturity profile | Large principal repayments due soon could crowd out dividend cash. |
Data source: Balance sheet (total debt) and income statement (interest expense).
4. Recent Trends & Management Guidance
- Historical dividend growth: If CBL has been raising dividends for several consecutive quarters/years while maintaining or expanding cash flow, that suggests a deliberate, sustainable policy.
- Management commentary: The press release excerpt you have does not include forward‑looking statements about cash‑flow expectations, but earnings‑call transcripts often contain guidance on “cash flow generation” and “capital‑allocation priorities.”
Red flags to watch:
- A sudden jump in dividend (e.g., 12.5 % as in this case) without a corresponding rise in cash flow or earnings.
- Management noting “we are using cash reserves” or “we are borrowing to fund the dividend.”
5. Putting It All Together – A Sample “Sustainability Test”
Below is a hypothetical illustration of how you could evaluate the sustainability of the $0.45 quarterly dividend. (You will need to replace the numbers with CBL’s actual figures.)
Item | CBL’s actual (example) | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Quarterly operating cash flow per share | $0.80 | 0.80 ÷ 0.45 ≈ 1.78 × dividend → comfortable coverage. |
Quarterly free cash flow per share | $0.55 | 0.55 ÷ 0.45 ≈ 1.22 × dividend → modest but still above dividend. |
EPS (quarterly) | $0.60 | Dividend payout = 0.45 ÷ 0.60 ≈ 75 % → within REIT norms. |
FCF‑based payout ratio | 0.45 ÷ 0.55 ≈ 82 % | Slightly high; could be sustainable if cash‑flow is stable and debt is low. |
Debt‑to‑EBITDA | 3.5× | Acceptable for a REIT; not overly leveraged. |
Interest‑coverage | 2.0× | Adequate cushion for interest payments. |
Cash‑on‑hand | $150 M (≈ $1.00 per share) | Provides ~2 months of dividend payments in reserve. |
If CBL’s real numbers look similar to the example above, the dividend increase would appear reasonably sustainable—the company generates enough cash each quarter to cover the payout, the payout ratios are within typical REIT ranges, and leverage is moderate.
Conversely, if the actual cash‑flow per share is below $0.45, the payout ratio exceeds 100 % of free cash flow, or debt‑service metrics are strained, the increase would be questionable and could be at risk of being reversed in a later quarter.
6. How to Get the Required Data Quickly
- SEC EDGAR – Search for “CBL Properties” → latest Form 10‑Q (likely filed within the past 30 days).
- Investor Relations page – CBL often posts a “Quarterly Results” slide deck that includes cash‑flow tables and dividend policy notes.
- Financial‑data platforms (e.g., Bloomberg, FactSet, Yahoo Finance) – Look up “CBL Properties” → “Cash Flow per Share,” “Free Cash Flow,” “Payout Ratio.”
- Analyst reports – Many brokerage houses publish a “Dividend Sustainability” note for REITs; these can give a quick snapshot of the payout ratio and cash‑flow trends.
7. Bottom‑Line Takeaway (Given the Information at Hand)
- The press release alone does not provide enough data to definitively answer whether the 12.5 % dividend increase is sustainable.
- Sustainability hinges on three pillars: (1) sufficient operating/free cash flow, (2) a payout ratio that leaves headroom after covering debt service and capital‑expenditure, and (3) a stable or improving balance‑sheet profile.
- Action step: Retrieve CBL’s most recent cash‑flow statement and earnings per share from its latest SEC filing or earnings release, compute the payout ratios, and compare them to the typical REIT benchmarks outlined above.
If those calculations show cash flow comfortably exceeding the dividend and a payout ratio in the 70 %–90 % range (or lower for free cash flow), the increase can be considered likely sustainable. If cash flow is thin, the payout ratio is high, or leverage is rising sharply, the dividend hike may be at risk and could be scaled back in future quarters.
Quick Checklist for You
✅ | Item to Verify |
---|---|
1 | Quarterly operating cash flow per share ≥ $0.45 |
2 | Quarterly free cash flow per share ≥ $0.45 |
3 | Dividend payout ratio (EPS) ≤ 90 % |
4 | Dividend payout ratio (FCF) ≤ 80 % |
5 | Debt‑to‑EBITDA ≤ 4.0× and interest coverage ≥ 1.5× |
6 | Adequate cash reserve to cover at least 2–3 months of dividend payments |
If all of the above are satisfied with CBL’s actual numbers, you can reasonably conclude that the 12.5 % dividend increase is sustainable in the near term. If any of the checks fail, the sustainability is questionable and you should monitor upcoming earnings releases for any dividend‑policy adjustments.