Short answer:
The press release you provided does not contain any statement about whether the StuartâŻWeitzman acquisition will be accretive (increase) or dilutive (decrease) to CaleresâŻInc.âs earnings per share (EPS). Therefore, based on the information given, we cannot specify an expected EPS impact.
Why the EPS effect isnât disclosed in the excerpt
Item in the release | Whatâs mentioned | Whatâs not mentioned |
---|---|---|
Purchase price | $120.2âŻmillion total (including $11.5âŻmillion cash at closing) | No forwardâlooking financial metrics |
Transaction structure | Cash acquisition, net purchase price $108.7âŻmillion after cash received | No proâforma earnings, EPS guidance, or dilution/accretion analysis |
Adjustments | Subject to netâworkingâcapital adjustments | No quantification of how those adjustments would affect EPS |
Management commentary | Only the fact that the deal âaccelerates brandâportfolio growthâ | No commentary on the impact to earnings, cash flow, or share count |
In many M&A announcements, the acquiring company will often include a line such as âthe transaction is expected to be accretive to EPS in FYâŻ2026â or âthe deal is expected to be neutral to EPS.â That language is absent here.
How EPS impact is normally estimated (for context)
If you later locate a more detailed filing (e.g., a FormâŻ8âK, a supplemental press release, or an earnings call transcript), the following pieces of data are typically used to calculate the expected EPS effect:
- Incremental Net Income â The projected contribution of StuartâŻWeitzman to Caleresâ net earnings after accounting for integration costs, additional depreciation/amortization, and any interest or tax effects.
- Financing Mix â How the $108.7âŻmillion net purchase price is funded (cash on hand, new debt, equity issuance, or a mix). Debt financing adds interest expense; equity financing dilutes EPS by increasing the share count.
- ProâForma Share Count â If new shares are issued, the total diluted share count rises, which can offset the earnings boost.
- Timing â When the acquired brandâs earnings start contributing (often the following fiscal year) versus when the costs are incurred (at closing).
- Adjustment for WorkingâCapital & Contingent Considerations â Final purchase price adjustments can slightly alter the total cost basis.
A typical accretion/dilution calculation looks like:
[
\text{Proâforma EPS} = \frac{\text{Caleres FYâN Net Income (actual)} + \text{Incremental Net Income from acquisition} - \text{Financing Costs}}{\text{Current diluted shares} + \text{New shares issued (if any)}}
]
If Proâforma EPS > Current EPS, the deal is accretive; otherwise, it is dilutive.
What you can do next
- Check Caleresâ recent SEC filings (FormâŻ8âK, 10âQ, 10âK) for a detailed âtransaction impactâ section. Companies are required to discuss EPS effect if material.
- Listen to the earnings call or read the accompanying transcript after the acquisition close; management often addresses EPS expectations there.
- Review analyst reports (e.g., from JPMorgan, MorganâŻStanley, etc.) that may have modeled the dealâs impact on EPS based on disclosed financial assumptions.
- Contact Investor Relations â A direct inquiry to Caleresâ IR team often yields a concise statement on whether the transaction is expected to be EPSâaccretive or dilutive.
Bottom line
From the news snippet you shared, no EPS accretion/dilution guidance is provided. To obtain that information youâll need to look at more detailed corporate disclosures or analyst commentary that specifically address the earnings impact of the StuartâŻWeitzman acquisition.