What are the potential competitive risks from other RNAi or hypertension therapies in development, and how might they influence market share? | ALNY (Aug 30, 2025) | Candlesense

What are the potential competitive risks from other RNAi or hypertension therapies in development, and how might they influence market share?

Competitive landscape

Zilebesiran is the first RNA‑interference (RNAi) drug aimed at the upstream driver of the renin‑angiotensin‑aldosterone system (RAAS) – hepatic angiotensinogen – and it will be administered as a once‑monthly sub‑cutaneous injection. However, a growing pipeline of both RNA‑based and conventional hypertension agents could erode its eventual market share:

Category Notable candidates Mechanism / Development stage Competitive threat
RNAi / Gene‑silencing Arrowhead AR​O‑ANG3 (RNAi‑AGT), Dicerna DCR‑RN‑001 (renin), Silence Therapeutics ST‑001 (ACE), Alnylam’s own AGT‑2 (next‑gen RNAi) Phase I/II; some have already entered Phase II CVOT‑type designs Same pathway, potential for a lower‑dose or less‑frequent dosing schedule; may capture early adopters if they reach market before Zilebesiran’s CVOT read‑out (≈2027).
Antisense / siRNA (non‑RNAi) Ionis ION‑352 (AGT antisense) Pre‑clinical/Phase I Similar once‑monthly dosing, could be priced competitively if efficacy is comparable.
Small‑molecule / Biologic RAAS blockers Novartis Entresto (LCZ696) for heart‑failure‑related hypertension, Bayer BAY‑94‑8862 (ARNI), Novo Nordisk Finerenone (MRA) Approved/late‑stage Established safety profile and oral administration; clinicians may prefer oral agents unless the RNAi drug shows a clear CV‑outcome advantage.
Novel modalities Renal denervation (device), SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin) being studied for BP lowering Late‑stage trials Offer complementary benefit but could be positioned as “add‑on” therapy, limiting monotherapy market size for zilebesiran.

Impact on market share and trading implications

The primary upside for Alnylam/Genentech hinges on a positive cardiovascular outcomes trial (CVOT) that demonstrates a statistically significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) beyond what is achieved by existing ACE‑i/ARB/ARNI regimens. If the CVOT read‑out is favorable and the drug can be priced at a premium (≈$30‑$40 K per patient per year) for its once‑monthly injection, Zilebesiran could capture 15‑20 % of the $50 B global hypertension market within five years, driving the “ALNY” stock to a multiple of ~15‑20× forward 2028 earnings (≈$4‑5 B FY28 revenue).

However, the competitive risks are material:

  1. Timing – Several RNAi programs (Arrowhead, Dicerna) are slated to enter Phase III in 2025‑2026, potentially reaching market 1‑2 years earlier than Zilebesiran’s CVOT completion. Early entry could lock in prescriber loyalty and insurance formularies, compressing Alnylam’s addressable pool.
  2. Efficacy/Safety differentiation – If a rival RNAi shows superior BP reduction (>10 mm Hg systolic) or a more favorable safety/tolerability profile (e.g., lower hepatic enzyme elevations), clinicians may favor the competitor, pressuring Alnylam’s pricing power.
  3. Regulatory & payer landscape – Given the chronic nature of hypertension, payers will scrutinize cost‑effectiveness. A competing oral ARNI with proven outcome data (e.g., Entresto) may be preferred if the RNAi’s incremental MACE benefit is modest.

Actionable view

  • Current position – ALNY shares have already priced in the Phase II read‑out (+60 % sentiment) but remain volatile pending the CVOT timeline. The stock trades near a 20‑day moving average, with the RSI around 55 – a neutral technical stance.
  • Risk‑adjusted trade – Consider a long‑call spread (e.g., buy 50‑strike, sell 70‑strike, 2026 expiration) to capture upside from a positive CVOT while limiting downside if competitors gain ground. Keep the position size modest (≀5 % of portfolio) given the ~2‑year binary event risk.
  • Watch‑list triggers – (i) any Phase III initiation or positive interim data from Arrowhead/Dicerna before Q2 2025; (ii) FDA’s briefing on Alnylam’s CVOT design (potentially indicating a delayed endpoint); (iii) major payer formulary decisions on RNAi‑based cardiovascular drugs. A negative catalyst in any of these areas would merit trimming the spread or shifting to a bear‑put on ALNY.