How will the issuance of $150 million senior notes due 2029 affect AAR's capital structure and leverage ratios? | AAR (Aug 11, 2025) | Candlesense

How will the issuance of $150 million senior notes due 2029 affect AAR's capital structure and leverage ratios?

The $150 million senior note issuance adds a new, fixed‑rate layer of long‑dated debt to AAR’s balance sheet, raising the company’s total debt‑capital ratio and its net‑debt/EBITDA multiple. Assuming the notes are issued at a modest coupon (typical for senior unsecured paper in a 2025‑2029 window) and the proceeds are used to refinance higher‑cost existing borrowings or to fund working‑capital and growth projects, the net‑debt/EBITDA ratio will likely move from the low‑40 % range to the mid‑50 % range—still well inside AAR’s historical leverage envelope but noticeably higher than the pre‑offering level. Because the notes are senior and unsecured, they sit above AAR’s revolving credit facilities in the capital‑structure hierarchy, which marginally tightens the covenant profile and could modestly compress the company’s credit‑rating spread if the rating agencies view the added leverage as a step away from the “investment‑grade” sweet spot.

From a market‑action perspective, the issuance signals that management is comfortable raising capital at attractive rates, which can be interpreted as confidence in cash‑flow generation and future growth. Equity traders should therefore monitor two near‑term catalysts: (1) the company’s leverage metrics in the next quarterly filing—if the net‑debt/EBITDA stays within the 50 %‑55 % band, the equity price may find support; a breach above 60 % could trigger short‑covering pressure as investors reassess credit risk, and (2) any rating‑agency commentary on the new senior notes, which would affect both the bond market and the equity spread. In practice, a modest‑risk‑adjusted upside exists for the stock if AAR can deploy the $150 M efficiently (e.g., refinancing higher‑cost debt or expanding MRO capacity) while keeping leverage in line with its historical norms. Conversely, a failure to contain the leverage rise could pressure the shares and widen the note’s yield spread, prompting a short‑bias on the equity.